当前位置：首页 > news >正文

Spring @Resource, @Autowired and @Inject 注入

news 来源：原创 2024/4/30 6:26:15

Overview

I’ve been asked several times to explain the difference between injecting Spring beans with ‘@Resource’, ‘@Autowired’, and ‘@Inject’. While I received a few opinions from colleagues and read a couple of posts on this topic I didn’t feel like I had a complete picture.

Annotations

Annotation	Package	Source
@Resource	javax.annotation	Java
@Inject	javax.inject	Java
@Qualifier	javax.inject	Java
@Autowired	org.springframework.bean.factory	Spring

In order to explore the behavior of each annotation I fired up Spring Tool Suite and started debugging the code. I used Spring 3.0.5.RELEASE in my research. The following is a summary of my findings.

The Code

I wanted to know how ‘@Resource’, ‘@Autowired’, and ‘@Inject’ resolved dependencies. I created an interface called ‘Party’ and created two implementations classes. This allowed me to inject beans without using the concrete type. This provided the flexibility I needed to determine how Spring resolves beans when there are multiple type matches.

public interface Party { }

‘Person’ is a component and it implements ‘Party’.

package com.sourceallies.person;...
@Component
public class Person implements Party { }

‘Organization’ is a component and it implements ‘Party’.

package com.sourceallies.organization;...
@Component
public class Organization implements Party { }

I setup a Spring context that scans both of these packages for beans marked with ‘@Component’.

<context:component-scan base-package="com.sourceallies.organization"/>
<context:component-scan base-package="com.sourceallies.person"/>

Tests

Test 1: Ambiguous Beans

In this test I injected a ‘Party’ bean that has multiple implementations in the Spring context.

@Resource
private Party party;

@Autowired
private Party party;

@Inject
private Party party;

In all three cases a ‘NoSuchBeanDefinitionException’ is thrown. While this exception’s name implies that no beans were found, the message explains that two beans were found. All of these annotations result in the same exception.

org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: 
No unique bean of type [com.sourceallies.Party] is defined: expected single matching bean but found 2: [organization, person]

Test 2: Field Name

In this test I named the Party field person. By default beans marked with ‘@Component’ will have the same name as the class. Therefore the name of the class ‘Person’ is person.

@Resource
private Party person;

@Autowired
private Party person;

@Inject
private Party person;

‘@Resource’ can also take an optional ‘name’ attribute. This is equivalent to the ‘@Resource’ code above. In this case the field variable name remains ‘party’. There is no equivalent syntax for ‘@Autowired’ or ‘@Inject’. Instead you would have to use a ‘@Qualifier’. This syntax will be covered later.

@Resource(name="person")
private Party party;

All four of these styles inject the ‘Person’ bean.

Test 3: Field Type

In this test I changed the type to be a ‘Person’.

@Resource
private Person party;

@Autowired
private Person party;

@Inject
private Person party;

All of these annotations inject the ‘Person’ bean.

Test 4: Default Name Qualifier

In this test I use a ‘@Qualifier’ annotation to point to the default name of the ‘Person’ component.

@Resource
@Qualifier("person")
private Party party;

@Autowired
@Qualifier("person")
private Party party;

@Inject
@Qualifier("person")
private Party party;

All of these annotations inject the ‘Person’ bean.

Test 5: Qualified Name

I added a ‘@Qualifier’ annotation to the ‘Person’ class

package com.sourceallies.person;...
@Component
@Qualifier("personBean")
public class Person implements Party { }

In this test I use a ‘@Qualifier’ annotation to point to the qualified name of the ‘Person’ component.

@Resource
@Qualifier("personBean")
private Party party;

@Autowired
@Qualifier("personBean")
private Party party;

@Inject
@Qualifier("personBean")
private Party party;

All of these annotations inject the ‘Person’ bean.

Test 6: List of Beans

In this test I inject a list of beans.

@Resource
private List<Party> parties;

@Autowired
private List<Party> parties;

@Inject
private List<Party> parties;

All of these annotations inject 2 beans into the list. This can also be accomplished with a ‘@Qualifier’. Each bean marked with a specific qualifier will be added to the list.

Test 7: Conflicting messages

In this test I add a bad ‘@Qualifier’ and a matching field name.

@Resource
@Qualifier("bad")
private Party person;

@Autowired
@Qualifier("bad")
private Party person;

@Inject
@Qualifier("bad")
private Party person;

In this case the field marked with ‘@Resource’ uses the field name and ignores the ‘@Qualifier’. As a result the ‘Person’ bean is injected.

However the ‘@Autowired’ and ‘@Inject’ field throw a ‘NoSuchBeanDefinitionException’ error because it can not find a bean that matches the ‘@Qualifier’.

 org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: 
 No matching bean of type [com.sourceallies.Party] found for dependency: expected at least 1 bean which qualifies as autowire candidate for this dependency. 
Dependency annotations: {@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired(required=true),
@org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier(value=bad)}

Conclusions

With the exception of test 2 & 7 the configuration and outcomes were identical. When I looked under the hood I determined that the ‘@Autowired’ and ‘@Inject’ annotation behave identically. Both of these annotations use the ‘AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor’ to inject dependencies. ‘@Autowired’ and ‘@Inject’ can be used interchangeable to inject Spring beans. However the ‘@Resource’ annotation uses the ‘CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor’ to inject dependencies. Even though they use different post processor classes they all behave nearly identically. Below is a summary of their execution paths.

@Autowired and @Inject

Matches by Type
Restricts by Qualifiers
Matches by Name

@Resource

Matches by Name
Matches by Type
Restricts by Qualifiers (ignored if match is found by name)

While it could be argued that ‘@Resource’ will perform faster by name than ‘@Autowired’ and ‘@Inject’ it would be negligible. This isn’t a sufficient reason to favor one syntax over the others. I do however favor the ‘@Resource’ annotation for it’s concise notation style.

@Resource(name="person")

@Autowired
@Qualifier("person")

@Inject
@Qualifier("person")

You may argue that they can be equal concise if you use the field name to identify the bean name.

@Resource
private Party person;

@Autowired
private Party person;

@Inject
private Party person;

True enough, but what happens if you want to refactor your code? By simply renaming the field name you’re no longer referring to the same bean. I recommend the following practices when wiring beans with annotations.

Spring Annotation Style Best Practices

Explicitly name your component [@Component(“beanName”)]
Use ‘@Resource’ with the ‘name’ attribute [@Resource(name=”beanName”)]
Avoid ‘@Qualifier’ annotations unless you want to create a list of similar beans. For example you may want to mark a set of rules with a specific ‘@Qualifier’ annotation. This approach makes it simple to inject a group of rule classes into a list that can be used for processing data.
Scan specific packages for components [context:component-scan base-package=”com.sourceallies.person”]. While this will result in more component-scan configurations it reduces the chance that you’ll add unnecessary components to your Spring context.

Following these guidelines will increase the readability and stability of your Spring annotation configurations.

附:中文解说

spring2.5提供了基于注解（Annotation-based）的配置，我们可以通过注解的方式来完成注入依赖。在Java代码中可以使用 @Resource或者@Autowired注解方式来经行注入。虽然@Resource和@Autowired都可以来完成注入依赖，但它们之间是有区别的。首先来看一下：

a。@Resource默认是按照名称来装配注入的，只有当找不到与名称匹配的bean才会按照类型来装配注入；

b。@Autowired默认是按照类型装配注入的，如果想按照名称来转配注入，则需要结合@Qualifier一起使用；

c。@Resource注解是又J2EE提供，而@Autowired是由Spring提供，故减少系统对spring的依赖建议使用

@Resource的方式；

d。 @Resource和@Autowired都可以书写标注在字段或者该字段的setter方法之上

2、使用注解的方式，我们需要修改spring配置文件的头信息，修改部分红色标注，如下

   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"
       xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context
http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-2.5.xsd">

<context:annotation-config/>

</beans>

3、修改以上配置文件的头信息后，我们就可以在Java代码通过注解方式来注入bean，看下面代码

（1）@Resource

public class StudentService3 implements IStudentService {

//@Resource(name="studentDao")放在此处也是可行的
private IStudentDao studentDao;

private String id;

public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}

@Resource(name="studentDao") // 通过此注解完成从spring配置文件中查找名称为studentDao的bean来装配字段studentDao，如果spring配置文件中不存在 studentDao名称的bean则转向按照bean类型经行查找
public void setStudentDao(IStudentDao studentDao) {
this.studentDao = studentDao;
}

public void saveStudent() {
studentDao.saveStudent();
System.out.print(",ID 为："+id);
}

}

配置文件添加如下信息

(2)@Autowired

public class StudentService3 implements IStudentService {

//@Autowired放在此处也是可行的
private IStudentDao studentDao;

private String id;

public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}

@Autowired//通过此注解完成从spring配置文件中查找满足studentDao类型的bean

//@Qualifier("studentDao")则按照名称经行来查找转配的
public void setStudentDao(IStudentDao studentDao) {
this.studentDao = studentDao;
}

public void saveStudent() {
studentDao.saveStudent();
System.out.print(",ID 为："+id);
}

}

配置文件添加如下信息

在java代码中可以使用@Autowire或者@Resource注解方式进行装配，这两个注解的区别是：
@Autowire 默认按照类型装配，默认情况下它要求依赖对象必须存在如果允许为null，可以设置它required属性为false，如果我们想使用按照名称装配，可以结合@Qualifier注解一起使用;

@Resource默认按照名称装配，当找不到与名称匹配的bean才会按照类型装配，可以通过name属性指定，如果没有指定name属性，当注解标注在字段上，即默认取字段的名称作为bean名称寻找依赖对象，当注解标注在属性的setter方法上，即默认取属性名作为bean名称寻找依赖对象.

注意：如果没有指定name属性，并且按照默认的名称仍然找不到依赖的对象时候，会回退到按照类型装配，但一旦指定了name属性，就只能按照名称装配了.

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/brant/p/5723921.html